Trump Won Because 'Racism'? NO, YOU IDIOT!! | Louder With Crowder The race card gets old after hardly anytime at all. But playing the race card, when race is irrelevant, makes you a ... wait for it ... RACIST!
Re: Post-Election Analysis
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 8:39 am
by cactuspete
Rich Lowry on how Trump should respond to protesters Strong emotions following an unexpected loss!
Re: Post-Election Analysis
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 11:13 am
by surfsteve
Wildrose: That video looked fake. If those were bombs going off I'm sure they would have reported it. I can only assume they were some sort of fireworks generated for show. Probably funded by the 10% of the money that the Clinton Foundation didn't spend on themselves. Also I didn't know that California classified political violence as a hate crime. It's a start!
Re: Post-Election Analysis
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 11:36 am
by surfsteve
Where were all those protesters when they picked Bush over Gore; when we really needed them? Before Obama, Bush was the worst president we ever had. We haven't had a good president since Reagan; if you consider all the bad things that went on behind his back, on account of Bush Sr. running the secret service; perhaps even as far back as Kennedy!
Re: Post-Election Analysis
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 12:39 pm
by sandman
Billionaire Soros linked to anti-Trump protests - WikiLeaks This is not at all surprising. Soros is behind a lot of what is wrong with this world.
Re: Post-Election Analysis
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 5:46 pm
by mrgreen
Political Analyst Weighs In On Anti-Trump Protests This guy does an excellent job of summarizing the dynamics of this election. Very straightforward and clear with no mincing of words.
Re: Post-Election Analysis
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2016 8:52 am
by surfsteve
I agree. We need to get rid of the electoral college. I shouldn't have to move out of California; just to make my vote count. We also need to reduce election fraud: from rigged voting machines, to illegal voter participation; to preventing people from voting multiple times. Everyone says that Hillary would have won had they counted only the popular vote; but that is not necessarily true. Had the goal been to get the most popular votes instead of electoral votes, both candidates would have changed their strategies; so it is a moot point, crying over who won the popular vote. Reversing the election at this point would be like changing the rules after a football game; to award the win to the team that got the most yards, instead of the team that got the most touchdowns!
Re: Post-Election Analysis
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2016 9:27 am
by surfsteve
Also. I'm getting sick of the media saying Hillary lost the election because of racism. Hillary lost because she was totally corrupt; not because of racism; or her policies. Well maybe the fact that she wanted to continue TPP, Obama Care and start a war with Russia. But than those all came about through corruption. Maybe it's a chicken or the egg thing. Did she make bad policies because she was corrupt; or was she corrupt because she made bad policies?
Re: Post-Election Analysis
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2016 12:48 pm
by surfsteve
Look! Trump is already creating new job opportunities all across America!
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 8:14 am
